For organisations
Discuss your environment and assessment objectives.
Tell us what you need to understand and which systems are concerned.
Testing services
Different assessment methods answer different questions. The engagement scope should reflect your environment, objectives and operational constraints.
Identify and prioritise weaknesses.
Explore serviceValidate exploitability within an agreed scope.
Explore serviceExamine implementation weaknesses.
Explore serviceTest objective-led attack scenarios.
Explore serviceImprove detection and response with your defenders.
Explore serviceNot sure which assessment fits? Discuss your environment and objectives with CSF.
Human-led testing
Automated tools help identify possible weaknesses. A penetration test adds controlled investigation, attack-path analysis and human judgement within agreed boundaries.
Investigate whether a weakness can be used in practice and under which conditions.
Examine how separate weaknesses and controls interact across the agreed scope.
Connect technical evidence with the systems, data and operations that may be affected.
Our approach
A structured process that turns technical findings into meaningful, prioritised actions for your organisation.
Agree the questions, systems and outcomes.
Confirm scope, permissions and rules of engagement.
Conduct the agreed assessment activities.
Present findings, evidence and business context.
Prioritise practical improvement actions.
Validate agreed fixes where included in the engagement.
Deliverables
Clear, structured outputs that help you understand the risks, take action and demonstrate progress.
A clear summary of important findings and their implications.
Detailed findings and supporting evidence appropriate to the assessment.
Recommendations to support remediation planning.
Connect findings with the agreed risk and assurance objectives.
Assurance goals
Start with the questions your organisation needs to answer. Agree the testing scope around your technical risks and assurance objectives.
Inform risk treatment and control evaluation.
Support risk-management and improvement activities.
Investigate product security weaknesses.
Address procurement and contractual expectations.
Testing supports your wider assurance programme. It does not establish compliance on its own.
The bigger picture
RedShield is Cyber Security Finland Oy’s specialist security-testing offering. Explore wider governance, product security and assurance support at cybersecurity.fi.
Explore CSF servicesBuyer questions
Tell us the assessment type, approximate scope, business objective and preferred timeframe. Do not send credentials or sensitive system details through the form.
Yes. Systems, access levels, permitted techniques, timing and reporting needs are agreed before testing begins.
No. Testing can provide technical evidence for a wider assurance programme, but it does not establish compliance or certification on its own.
Retesting is included only where it is agreed in the engagement scope.
Work with us
For organisations
Tell us what you need to understand and which systems are concerned.
For independent experts
Share your areas of expertise and availability. Assignments are agreed per engagement.